Top: The old chute was quaint and picturesque, but it was dangerous, too, and it was difficult to comprehend what it was, or what it meant.
Bottom: The new chute, as of April 2005. You truly get the sense of its 220′ length in the photo.
Top: The old chute was quaint and picturesque, but it was dangerous, too, and it was difficult to comprehend what it was, or what it meant.
Bottom: The new chute, as of April 2005. You truly get the sense of its 220′ length in the photo.
Leave A Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.